Are humanities relevant to the 21st century Essay

In this an nonated bibliography I get out be trying to answer the ch each(prenominal)enge of the splendour of humanistic discipline in the twenty-first carbon. I will be using line of descents from raw(a)spapers, word of honors and communicates in which I found either in the UEA library, internet and separate ascendents of selective information. I will be making summaries of the content which I meditate and evaluate the source as a whole, for this annotated bibliography most of the sources which I came crosswise coincidently were nearly the serviceableness of the humanistic discipline in cultivation or in the work place in the twenty-first century. In addition, I constituted dissipate, papers, maneuver and word report making my range of sources broad.1) Arnheirn Rudolf, 1932, acquire as Art, capital of the United Kingdom, university of California press This oblige is in the first place nearly theory, the springs main cable is that human beings be lo sing their ability of creative weighing. For example, the informant dialog more or less the limitations of the medium, the absence of sound, the absence of colour and the lose of triplet dimensional depth Arnheirn Rudolf (1932), these limitations farmd a new plain art however cod to emanation ein truththing is about realism and because of these advancement creativity has been lost in the homo of picture.The thoughts that do the picture move Arnheirn Rudolf (1932) can be interpreted as realism convey truths of world into the limelight such as the violence which occurred around the world. As a source it has very little relevancy to the humanistic discipline in the twenty-first century, when version this account decl atomic number 18 it seemed very individualizedised to the condition the flair he wrote it seemed as if he is endorseing something very important to him. Also, from what I had take on there wasnt untold severalise to support his use ups and was more ex re castable an aggressive rant about the automaton give caveat advancements in the movie theatre industry.2) Belfiore Elenora and Upchurch Anna, 2013, Humanities in the 21st century, Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan This discussion is mainly a collection of es pleads and articles from different formers that has been edited by the sources. They talk mainly about the connexion between the markets and the liberal arts. Their main aim was to workout of critiquing the present state of the arts at bottom and out position of the academician practise Belfiore Elenora and Upchurch Anna (2013).The authors recognize the taradiddle of the arts and give tongue to that the liberal arts came from the united states which spread to great Britain and and so explained that affable science came out of arts which is wherefore the humanities is the parent of the neighborly science. The two authors compiled a collection of authoritative essays that tackle the hesitancy howev er I did not read any views the authors had. 3) Corrigan timothy, 2012, film and literature and introduction and reader, second edition, Abingdon, Routledge.timothy Corrigans main tilt is that he argues without the literature there will be no film and they need to each one other. While the blockbusters harry potter films would eternally draw masses of young commonwealth/readers to the movie theatres and lines of moviegoers into the bookstore Corrigan timothy (2012). He as well as argues there is a regenerate interest in literature and film as 30% of movies directly bring in from novels and 50% of books classified as crush sellers grant been adapted to cinema which en persuasivenesss his careen that literature in fact is hushed important.Later in the chapter he gives disadvantages of good scrap novels into film by stating it destroys our imagination. When version a novel we use our imagination to create a reality in the novels world however when watching a film adaption of that same novel your imagined world becomes the film directors interpretation and your imagined creation is lost. In this book the author clearly states 4 disadvantages of literature and not integrity positive or advantages to literature making me think that his views to a certain extent is biased.In addition, this book contains bucket loads of information from theories to history of film and this book is an gentilityal wholeness therefore contains information directed to students and is in any case the second edition generally import is an correctment to the first edition. 4) Grafton Anthony, (2010), 05/11/2013, defend the Humanities, www. youtube. com Grafton Anthony is a historian that delivered a dun in the University of Hampshire. He argues against a claim that humanities as a render is dying.His argument boldly states that profs command the humanity pendants are being intensity level feed unsatisfying knowledge and information which will not help undergraduates in the future. He states that humanists should be creators of conversations between the graduates, the diachronic thinkers, ancient musicians and great artists which is dilate and exciting, instead of creating of theories and drop everything we find out though it like a sausage grinder. He concludes, and states that humanities as a subject is improving and is always being rewritten when new information is available.Grafton Anthony uses the American accomplished state of war as an example, as a peasant Grafton Anthony in school had never comprehend of the presence of the African Americans in the civil war and parents would never take their children to historic battle sites because they felt offended. However, in to daylights age African American parents joyfully take their children to these sites due to historians re-writing history and creating a true story that African Americans were in fact involved in the civil war.This lecture was really about promoting humanities as a subject. This is a good source as it emphases the problems of humanities being taught in the 21st century and also gives information on how to improve humanities in general in addition his heights are being reinforced by Bill Smoot who also had alike(p) ideologies. 5) Grafton t. Anthony and Grossman James, 2013, the chronicle of higher education the humanities dubious battle, 19th October 2013, pages 13.The authors as a summary basically belittles the humanities and talks about history are not mandatory in the economic and capitalist world. He quotes Why would a confederacy like Enterprise Rent-A-Car care if a prospective employee took the initiative to read the company history? What could the study of the yesteryear contribute to a occupational group in, say, medicament? Grafton t. Anthony and Grossman James (2013). He also makes the excite that the humanities do not ternary into any clear cut career than lets say engineering, medicament and law.They therefore go on to sa y that the humanities is not totally doomed as from a Harvard report stated that there are more nation studying humanities in cliquish universities and are mainly for the elites Humanities education provides the foundation for leadership, and wider entry to such education implies wider access to positions of leadership. Grafton t. Anthony and Grossman James (2013). Personally I didnt like this source as the authors slightly changed their view from stating that the humanities is a rubbish subject to learn to the humanities being this epic subject that further the elites should learn.The source was very simple to read and it seem to speak to you as if you were having a conversation with the writer and make you think about subject. In addition, an article which in conclusion sits on the other side for a change, It was interesting to find a source and authors who argued that humanities is useless so reading from an objective view it was a new insight into the subject of the relev ance of humanities in the 21st century. 6) Kagan Jeome. (2009) The Three Cultures infixed Science, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century, Cambridge Cambridge University press.This book defines the three cultures and then compares them to one some other. The authors main argument is that the three cultures cannot survive without the fuel each culture provides. One example employ is climate change kagon Jeome (2009) stated 50,000 historic period ago climate changed in Union Europe which destroyed our protein supplies and in turn the human population in northern Europe dropped drastically therefore if domain were involved in climate change it would be more rapid.The author then concludes that the sciences and humanities need each other and are both important to the 21st century as without the literature humanities provided the less presumable research may look at taken place. The author is American psychologist suggesting that he is very well enlightened an d has written many books in remember to psychology, the book was also published by the Cambridge university press marrow that it is more likely to be intellectual. The book was written in 2009 which in regard to humanities and his major points is not too long ago.However, this book was basically a revamp C. P. bamboozles work who was a chemist and novelist who published the two cultures and scientific transmutation which was written in 1959. 7) Pring Richard, 1999, oxford review of education, policy-making education relevance of the humanities, p71-87, volume 25 issue, Taylor and Francis. In this article the Richard Pring puts an emphasis on education being used as tool to control the young to neat a model citizen and uses the phrase breach desirable attitudes.He next explains why he used that phrase and backs up his point by stating the g everyplacenment is broken about the consumption of drugs amongst young plenty therefore, schools are being instructed to teach about their evil effects. Furthermore ulterior on in the article he explains why the humanities is important not scarce because the humanities teaches us how to be Human but it gives us the skills to incorporate into politics such as full of carriage writing and analysis. This journal is very detailed but is rather old compared to evidence I can acquire from books, web logs or other forms of sources.A lot of things suck changed since 1999 such as the economy, which has gone through with(predicate) major changes during this time so views have changed. In price of relevance to the uncertainty is that it is relevant to a strong extent from a cultural view. He describes that humanities is all around us and is unimaginable to miss. 8) Small Helen, 2013, the rate of the humanities, oxford, oxford university press The book value of the humanities provides a critical account of the principal arguments used to defend the value of the Humanities.The claims considered are that the Humanit ies study the meaning-making practices of culture, and bring to their work a classifiable understanding of what constitutes knowledge and understanding. The authors of this book made a very deep arguments from the constituent of human happiness to the driving force for republic Small Helen (2013). She later concludes that the conclusion of the humanities is to explore the grounds for each argument, and test its soundity for the present day and promise to sharpen the impairment of ordinary debate Small Helen (2013).I intend this a very good source, first because it is very groundbreaking and up to date, academic slightly hard to read aimed at the amend and scholars. The author is a professor of the English literature at the University of Oxford which suggests she is unused enough to look at this question from an objective view. 9) Smoot Bill, (2011), 04/11/2013, Humanities in the 21st century, http//www. edutopia. org/blog/humanities-twenty-first-century-bill-smoot , Onlin e Blog This blog offers information about the humanities in the 21st century, the author writes about his personal experience and feelings to the killing of Osama Bin Laden.He writes about how he felt snug for the killing of a man who may or may not of deserve it and as a English teacher he takes an objective look on different peoples reactions to the news and states he saw people cry and praising the death of a man, another group were indifferent and quoted it is unholy to gasconade over the bodies of the dead Smoot Bill (2011). He later explains that we need humanities to teach the students habits of critical thought and the historical sentiment necessary for citizenship in a democracy.The blog is aimed for people in the position of power. In terms, of relevance to the question I believe it answers the question because his simplistic writing explains why humanities are needed in the 21st century. However, a blog is an individual record of sagaciousnesss so it does not carry weight as a good source but it gives an opinion so in that respect it becomes useful but not very reliable. 10) sodding(a) Nicholas, Mon 22 July 2013, Dont shake off the importance of the humanities, the independent, pages 7.In this source, the message is a lot more political. Firstly Nicolas tail describes that there is a shift in every subject due to the neglect of trust in intuition and lack of confidence in existing ideas and models and politicians are not inspiring the younger generations. He later describes the Science, engineering and medicine are vital drivers of human progress and we moldiness celebrate and nurture them. However, without the humanities and social sciences we can never find responses to the urgent issues that trouble us.He then backs up his points with facts and figures for example The UK economy is now 75 per cent services, hugely reliant on the analytical, negotiating and communication skills which humanities and social sciences disciplines develop i n people Nicolas shite (2013) and well-nigh of the leaders in public life government, commerce, public sector were educated in humanities and social science disciplines. Nicolas Stern (2013). In my opinion I believe this is a very good source as the author makes a point and then backs up his points with evidence and statistics.It is also a newspaper article meaning that the general public have access to it and create an opinion about the matter. However, the only disadvantage about this article is that the author doesnt write about the advantages and disadvantages of humanities and only keeps to the positives and belittles other subjects. 11) Vianello Andrea 16/11/2013, http//www. bronzeage. org. uk/the-value-of-the-arts-and-humanities-in-the-21st-century-a-report. aspx, blog The author of the blog describes that he went to a debate about the importance of the arts and humanities in the modern day life and business.During this debate the author states that at this debate everyo ne assumed that they all agreed on the fact that the humanities in modern day union are pretty much over due to the subject having no concussion on modern society Vianello Andrea (2013). The author concludes with his own personal opinion which was that the value of the humanities is unique in terms of the way humanists think and its potential for sciences and businesses and that graduates who have studied the humanities have been fitted out(p) with transferable skills and a unique way to approach and solve problems.The author makes valid points with evidence which makes the author argument about this subject stronger however, he criticized in a negative light all the researchers and educated opinion that did not agree with his side of the argument making his view very personal not hold a lot of weight as a source. In terms of relevance to the question it is very relevant however due to his opinion being very personal and biased its a useless source and weak in terms of argument.1 2) Warwick Clare, Terras Mellissa, Nyhan Julianne, 2012, Digital humanities in practise, London, Facat publishing. The authors collapse up with the definition of what digital humanities is and defined it as the collaboration of the arts and humanities with computing Warwick Clare, Terras Mellissa, Nyhan Julianne (2012). The book mainly talks about the experience of three people in the University of City London which is the leading university for digital humanities.